no one

Joined

• started 4 topics
• posted 155 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by no one

• 
  6

  Teaching a pig to sing?

  by Focus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this is not a parable.

  nor is this for most.. verily, verily, i say unto thee: "never try to teach a pig to sing.

  it wastes your time and annoys the pig.".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Have you seen the little piggies crawling in the dirt, and for all the little piggies, life is getting worse

  Always having dirt to play around in, have you see the bigger piggies, in their starched white shirts

  You will find the bigger piggies, stirring up the dirt, always have clean shirts to play around in

  In their sties with all their backing, they don't care what goes on around

  In their eyes there's something lacking, what they need's a darn good whacking

  Everywhere there's lots of piggies, living piggy lives, you can see them out for dinner, with their piggy wives

  Clutching forks and knives, to eat their bacon

  'Piggies" by George Harrison
• 
  18

  Talk: JWs are not go to a gym???

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i remember just a few short years back at my old congregation, there were a few younger brothers and sisters joining gyms and going to work out.

  well, i guess the elders found out that everyone's free time wasn't being spent pioneering, so a talk (down to) was given one sunday on "not letting worldy pursuits take your eyes off the prize" or some shit like that.

  the whole talk was about how we should devote all time to the wts and field service, and that going to or belong to a gym was just a worldly pursuit and that it was just making or bodies "showy".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Oh ye brothers and sisters of the 'buffed and ripped' class, is it not written at Lev. 3:16-17 that "All the fat belongs to Jehavah" and that we "must not eat any fat...at all"?

  So let us eat, drink, and be pudgy.
• 
  95

  So, what's your I.Q?

  by nakedmvistar in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  be honest if you know it.

  and yes, we are all aware of how insignificant this number can ultimately be.

  but i'm still curious so please share.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Smaller than my shoe size.
• 
  15

  Our "Aussie" Christmas Tree

  by Stephanus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  .

  the boys cutting it down:.

  the finished article:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Yep--I sent my brood out for a tree as well. Unfortunately, living in the desert with few trees, they returned sometime later with an 8' Sonora Cactus. Watered that sucker for 5 days before it finally quit sucking up the moisture.

  Spent 3 days after decorating it getting spines out of my hands and arms. Oh--if only I could find an excuse for not celebrating Christmas.
• 
  4

  More Statistics - Even more to die at Armageddon!

  by eyeslice in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  it comes up time and again in the wts literature and meetings just how jehovah is patient and loving by allowing this system to go on, thus allowing more people to be saved.. but, the figures dont add up.. i know that witnesses dont really believe that baptism is being born again, but on the other hand, it is implied that those who are not baptized are in danger at armageddon.

  this was brought out at this years dc, where young ones were urged to "seriously consider getting baptized".. .

  i am aware that figures can be made to say anything but in the table below, i have attempted to look at the difference between physical births and "spiritual" births, i.e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Here's something I've always chewed on when someone tells me that God doesn't want any of us to die.

  World population 12-31-1991=approx 5,376,000,000. World population today= approx 6,300,000,000.

  http://http://www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop/

  Number of JWs in 1991=approx 4 million. Number today=approx 6 million

  http://http://www.jwic.com/stat.htm

  So, this delay in Armageddon has resulted in a net increase of an additional 900,000,000 non-JW souls believed to be reserved for death at the great battle vs. 2 million additional potential survivors.
• 
  6

  Court of the Crimson King

  by pomegranate in

  1. social
  2. entertainment

  robert fripp.

  guitar, soundscapes.

  mellotron adrian belew.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Pom,

  On "the Court..." album there was a different lineup that included Greg Lake of Emerson, Lake, And Palmer fame providing lead vocals. Pete Sinfield was also involved w/early KC.

  Something else I noticed; on a recent "Behind the Music" (VH-1) about Pink Floyd, they showed a picture of Sid Barrett (when discussing his insanity) that was identical to the front cover artwork on "The Court" album. Unsure if that's where the artist got his idea, though.
• 
  34

  Sudden Rash of JW Apologists

  by NeonMadman in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  am i the only one who sees it as a bit odd that a large number of jw apologists has suddenly come out of the woodwork on this board to defend the actions of the watchtower society toward bill bowen, barbara anderson and the pandelos?

  for the longest time, virtually the only ones on this board who advocated an essentially orthodox jw viewpoint were you know and nytelecom/mavman (though each of them could easily be classed with us "apostates" if the watchtower knew of their disagreements with the party line).. but suddenly, we have a bunch of totally loyal, utterly doctrinaire jw apologists posting almost exclusively on threads related to the pedophile issue.

  most of them are taking next to impossible positions from any reasonable standpoint.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  My apologies, S4. Newbie jitters, I guess. The word 'here' set me off as referring to this particular thread.
• 
  34

  Sudden Rash of JW Apologists

  by NeonMadman in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  am i the only one who sees it as a bit odd that a large number of jw apologists has suddenly come out of the woodwork on this board to defend the actions of the watchtower society toward bill bowen, barbara anderson and the pandelos?

  for the longest time, virtually the only ones on this board who advocated an essentially orthodox jw viewpoint were you know and nytelecom/mavman (though each of them could easily be classed with us "apostates" if the watchtower knew of their disagreements with the party line).. but suddenly, we have a bunch of totally loyal, utterly doctrinaire jw apologists posting almost exclusively on threads related to the pedophile issue.

  most of them are taking next to impossible positions from any reasonable standpoint.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  Seeker4,

  Have noticed these attacks on Bill and company. And I think there may be a JW apologist or two here, as well.

  Having perused the list of posters til this point, an 'apologist' might be assigned to 'amac' who has identified his/herself as JW, although I don't think of 'amac' as an apologist.

  Your phrase 'or two' seems to point to me since the other posters are well-established. Sorry if my 'newbie' status set off an alarm for you.

  Strange how when I was in the org, I was challenged as being 'apostate' by 'elders'. Now that I'm out, I'm being challenged by an ex-'elder' as being an apologist. Wonderful!!!

  Thought here would be a safe haven from this type of BS.

  I'm sorry. I apologize. Please forgive me. My mistake......

  Apologetic enough for you?
• 
  21

  CARROT, EGG, OR COFFEE BEAN

  by Billygoat in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i usually delete these type of emails, but thought it was an interesting analogy and i thought i'd share.... .

  a young woman went to her mother and told her about her life and how things were so hard for her.

  she did not know how she was going to make it and wanted to give up.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  When I was young and angry and full of hurt, I was the water; always doing things to change/damage others.

  Finally, I encountered my 'coffee bean' who patiently and gently changed me.
• 
  34

  Sudden Rash of JW Apologists

  by NeonMadman in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  am i the only one who sees it as a bit odd that a large number of jw apologists has suddenly come out of the woodwork on this board to defend the actions of the watchtower society toward bill bowen, barbara anderson and the pandelos?

  for the longest time, virtually the only ones on this board who advocated an essentially orthodox jw viewpoint were you know and nytelecom/mavman (though each of them could easily be classed with us "apostates" if the watchtower knew of their disagreements with the party line).. but suddenly, we have a bunch of totally loyal, utterly doctrinaire jw apologists posting almost exclusively on threads related to the pedophile issue.

  most of them are taking next to impossible positions from any reasonable standpoint.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  no one

  If the posts that others make go unanswered, might that not encourage them to post elsewhere that their challenges/statements/whatever went unanswered here and encourage others to appear and post more BS?

  Would it not be better to wade thru the BS and continue to respond?